Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016

Stephen St Clair

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016 – 0285, written 12 Aug 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report12 Aug 2016
Reference2016 – 0285
DeceasedStephen St Clair
CoronerCaroline Sumeray
Coroner areaIsle of Wight
CategoryState Custody related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  The Rt Hon Elizabeth Truss MP, Secretary of State for Justice. 
2.  Michael Spurr, Director General of the National Offender Management 

Service. 

1 

CORONER 

I am Caroline Sarah Sumeray, Senior Coroner for the Coroner Area of the Isle of Wight. 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 

and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 4th November 2013 I commenced an investigation into the death of Stephen St Clair, 
aged 52. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 12th July 2016. The 

conclusion  of  the  inquest  was  “Open  Conclusion.  At  the  time  of  death,  the  deceased 

suffered  from  undiagnosed  mental  illness,  the  risks  of  which  were  not  evident  to 

personnel that were not medically trained.” The medical cause of death was found to be: 

 1a Exsanguination 

 1b Incision Wound of the Neck. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

1)  Stephen Bucouski was born on 22nd December 1960 in Widnes in Cheshire. He 

changed his name a few years before he died to Stephen St Clair. At the time of 

his death, he was 52 years of age. 

2)  On 17th August 2012, he was sentenced to a term of 14 years imprisonment. He 

initially  started  to  serve  this  sentence  at  a  prison  on  the  mainland  and  was 
transferred to HMP Isle of Wight on 31st July 2013. 

3)  Mr St Clair was reported to have been a quiet man who spent most of his free 
time  reading  in  his  cell  and  did  not  mix  much  with  other  prisoners.  On  20th 

August 2013, Mr St Clair put his concerns about his safety in writing to his Wing 

Officers.  He  said  that  he  had  heard  other  prisoners,  whose  identity  he  did  not 

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 know,  mentioning  his  name  and  threatening  violence.  Mr  St  Clair’s  Personal 

Officer  told  him  that  they  needed  more  information  about  the  other  prisoners 

before  anything  could  be  done.  A  Security  Information  Report  (SIR)  was 

completed to document Mr St Clair’s concerns, but it appears that there was no 

further investigation or action taken at that stage. 

4)  On  21st  October  2013,  Mr  St  Clair  made  a  formal  complaint  that  he  was  not 

being protected from other prisoners’ aggressive and threatening conversations 

about  him  and  that  this  was  affecting  his  mental  wellbeing.  As  part  of  the 

response, a Supervising Officer (SO) and a Wing Officer discussed his concerns 

with  him,  but  were  unable  to  find  any  evidence  of  threats  being  made.  In  a 

written response, outlining what they had agreed they could do to help him, the 

SO  indicated  that  a  Mental  Health  Referral  might  help  Mr  St  Clair  with  his 

anxieties, but the SO did not make a referral at that point. 

5)  On  Saturday  2nd  November,  Mr  St  Clair  spoke  to  the  SO  and  another  Wing 

Officer  about  the  written  response  that  he  had  received  to  his  complaint.  He 

handed  the  2  Prison  Officers  a  handwritten  2-sided  piece  of  A4  paper  with  a 

series of paranoid entries, apparently written within the previous 24 hours, giving 

considerable insight into his state of mind. During the conversation, the Prison 

Officers  decided  that  a  Mental  Health  Referral  was  necessary  and  made  one 

that day, but it was not due to be received by the Mental Health Inreach Team 
until the following Monday, 4th November, and was received by them after Mr St 

Clair’s  death.  The  Prison  Officers  considered  whether  Mr  St  Clair  might  be 

suicidal, but Mr St Clair said that he had no thoughts of killing himself. 

6)  Mr St Clair’s cellmate told the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman Investigator 

that  Mr  St  Clair  had  seemed  frightened  and  paranoid  for  some  weeks,  but  he 

had  seen  no  evidence  that  other  prisoners  were  threatening  him.  He  reported 
that,  on  2nd  November  2013,  Mr  St  Clair  appeared  to  be  very  anxious,  was 

awake  a  lot  at  night  and  paced  up  and  down  the  cell.    He  said  that  he  didn’t 

want to eat anything, even when his cellmate brought his meals to the cell. On 
Sunday 3rd November 2013, Mr St Clair’s cellmate told staff that he felt that he 

could no longer support Mr St Clair and did not want to share a cell with him any 

longer. 

7)  Mr St Clair was moved to a single cell on another Wing on the afternoon of 3rd 

November 2013. Prison Staff on his new Wing were unaware of the reasons for 

Mr  St  Clair’s  relocation,  beyond  a  vaguely  phrased  “paranoia”  with  no  further 

details  given.  No  further  consideration  was  given  to  whether  he  was  at  risk  of 

suicide or self-harm and needed additional support and monitoring. At no stage 

2

 
 
 
 
 
 was  an  ACCT  opened  in  respect  of  Mr  St  Clair  on  the  basis  that  the  Prison 

Officers did not believe that he was at risk of self-harm or suicide. 

8)  On  Monday  4th  November  2013,  at  a  routine  early  morning  roll  check,  Mr  St 

Clair was found in his cell with a severe cut to his throat. Although there were 

signs that he had already died, Prison Staff tried to resuscitate Mr St Clair, until 

paramedics arrived and pronounced his death at 05.55 hours. 

9)  Expert  evidence  heard  at  the  Inquest  from  a  Consultant  Forensic  Psychiatrist 

indicated  that  there  was  clear  evidence  of  paranoia  and  psychosis  in  the  note 

given to the Prison Officers, and this paranoia and irrational thinking was further 

evidenced in earlier conversations with both Prison Officers, Prison Staff and his 

cellmate. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 

my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 

circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:  –  

1.  The Prison Service Instruction (“PSI”) 64/2011 (Management of prisoners at risk 

of harm to self, to others and from others (Safer Custody)” addresses the “Risk 

Factors for Suicide”. There are various subheadings, including “Clinical History” 

where  the  following  point  is  made:  “Mental  illness  diagnosis  (e.g.  depression, 

bipolar  disorder,  schizophrenia)”  but  there  is  no  description  of  the  possible 

symptoms which might be displayed by those who may be suffering from as yet 

undiagnosed conditions. 

2.  The  next  section  in  PSI  64/2011  deals  with  “Risk  Factors  for  Self-Harm”  and 

includes  a  sub-heading  entitled  “Current  Context”  where  the  following  is 

included: “Irrational behaviour, out of touch with reality”. 

3. 

I  am  concerned  that  the  “Risk  Factors  for  Suicide”  does  not  actually  include 

words  to  the  effect  of  “Irrational  behaviour,  out  of  touch  with  reality”  as  the 

evidence  from  the  Consultant  Forensic  Psychiatrist  suggested  that  this 

behaviour was strongly suggestive of psychosis, and as such, the prisoner was 

in need of additional monitoring to keep him safe and to protect him from self-

harm or suicide. 

4. 

I am concerned that as this additional wording was not included in PSI 64/2011, 

the  Prison  Officers  did  not  feel  obligated  to  open  an  ACCT  document,  which 

3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 may have resulted in Mr St Clair being monitored more closely, thereby avoiding 

him taking his own life. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and/or 
your organisation have the power to take such action. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 6th October 2016. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I  have  sent  a  copy  of  my  report  to  the  Chief  Coroner  and  to  the  following  Interested 
Persons: the family of Stephen St Clair; Care UK; Peter Clarke CVO OBE QPM, HM 
Chief  Inspector  of  Prisons  and  Andy  Lattimore,  Governing  Governor  of  HMP  Isle  of 
Wight. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The  Chief  Coroner  may  publish  either  or  both  in  a  complete  or  redacted  or  summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or  of  interest.  You  may  make  representations  to  me,  the  Coroner,  at  the  time  of  your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

H.M. Senior Coroner – Isle of Wight 

12th August 2016                                               

4

Related reports

Other reports by Caroline Sumeray

See all →

More reports categorised “State Custody related deaths”

See all →

Track State Custody related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching State Custody related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.